Compliance-Gated AI Ops · Finance

Your team is running AI on client money.
Who's auditing the setup?

If AI now touches client data, money movement, or anything a reviewer could ask about, "it works on my machine" isn't good enough. Brainfile runs the compliance and security gates for your Claude / agent config — secret exposure, change-control drift, data boundaries, reproducibility — the ones no dev tool ships.

One-time snapshot for a risk committee · then ongoing enforcement
Run on our own 6 live businesses daily Scored, deterministic, repeatable Every finding is a concrete fix

The compliance problem for finance

Your firm has controls for code, for data, for money. But the AI configuration that now sits between your team and all three? Nobody owns it. Here's the gap.

!Secret & key exposure. An un-ignored .env, a hardcoded API key, a credential pasted into an agent's context — any of these can leak the keys to your data or your accounts, and they ship silently.
!Change-control & drift = an audit gap. Does your agent constitution match what's actually running, or has it quietly drifted? If you can't show what changed, when, and why, you can't answer a reviewer — an unauditable AI setup is a compliance finding waiting to happen.
!Data-boundary hygiene. Where does customer or financial data flow through prompts and context files — and where should it never go? Most teams have never mapped it, so they can't attest to it.
!Reproducibility for review. Can a colleague, an auditor, or a regulator reconstruct how your AI reached an output? If the answer is "not really," you have a trust problem the moment anyone asks.

What Brainfile gates — and the compliance outcome

These aren't opinions or a checklist. They're the exact automated gates that guard our own production, mapped to what a finance or risk team actually needs to show.

The gate we run
What it gives your risk team
Drift detector
Proof your deployed AI config matches its documented constitution — change-control you can evidence, not assert.
Deploy gate
Nothing ships with an exposed secret, an un-ignored .env, or an unresolved conflict — the leak paths are blocked before release.
Visual-QA
No placeholder text, stale dates, or empty outputs reach a client-facing surface — the "obviously wrong" failures caught pre-delivery.
Launch-readiness
Docs, tests, and dependency manifests present — the setup is reproducible for review instead of living in one person's head.
Positioning / content drift
Claims, prices, and disclosures stay consistent across every surface — no rogue statement your compliance team never approved.

Why us — we run these gates on ourselves

Anyone can read your config and hand you an opinion. We don't. The engine in this audit is the same code that guards our own business — every day, on every deploy.

We run these exact gates on six live businesses, daily.

Secret-exposure, change-control/drift, data-boundary hygiene, reproducibility-for-review — the same drift detector, deploy gate, visual-QA and launch-readiness engine that ships in this audit is the code that keeps our own production honest. You're not renting a checklist. You're renting battle-tested infrastructure that has to work for us before it ever runs on you. Same engine, same rubric, every time — so the score is comparable and you can re-run it after you fix things.

Where to start

A one-time snapshot for your next risk review, then ongoing enforcement so it can't drift back.

Step 2 · ongoing
$99/mo
BRAINFILE OS · OR $999/YR
  • The same gates, run continuously — not once
  • Drift caught the moment it happens, not at the next audit
  • The full Claude operating system these gates come from
  • 30-day free trial · cancel anytime
See the full OS

Questions finance teams ask

Can I put the report in front of a regulator or risk committee?

Yes — that's exactly what it's built for. You get a scored, defensible snapshot of your AI-configuration posture, with each finding naming the file, the risk, and the concrete fix. It documents posture in language a reviewer can follow. Be clear on what it is: a posture snapshot, not a legal or regulatory certification.

Does this replace SOC 2 or a compliance certification?

No — and we won't pretend otherwise. This is an AI-configuration posture audit, not a certification. It does not replace SOC 2, ISO 27001, or any legal or regulatory compliance program. What it does is surface the AI-specific risks — secret exposure, config drift, data-boundary and reproducibility gaps — that those frameworks don't look at directly. Think of it as the AI layer your existing program doesn't cover yet.

What do you need from us?

Read access to your repo, or a zip of your Claude / agent setup. We run the audit against it and return the report. No access to your running systems, your production data, or your live secrets is required.

How is the score calculated?

Five weighted dimensions — deploy-gate readiness (30%), infra coverage & drift (25%), then visual-QA, launch readiness, and cost/token hygiene (15% each) — each scored 0–100 and rolled into one overall grade. The same engine and rubric run on every setup, so your number is comparable and repeatable.

Is the $249 audit a subscription?

No. The audit is a one-time purchase per setup. If you want the gates enforced continuously so your setup can't quietly drift back out of compliance, that's the Brainfile OS at $99/month (or $999/year), with a 30-day free trial.

Why should we trust the engine?

Because it isn't built for you first — it's built for us. The same drift, deploy-gate, visual-QA and launch-readiness code runs on our own six live businesses every day. It has to pass on our production before it ever scores yours.

Find out what a reviewer would find first.

Start with the $249 AI-Ops Audit — one scored snapshot of your AI setup, ready for your next risk review.